Pharmaceutical Industry Faces Widespread Layoffs Amid Strategic Shifts and Financial Pressures

The pharmaceutical and biotech sectors continue to grapple with significant workforce reductions as companies reevaluate priorities and seek to extend cash runways in a challenging economic environment. Recent months have seen a wave of layoffs affecting thousands of employees across the industry.
Major Players Implement Cost-Cutting Measures
Several large pharmaceutical companies have announced substantial job cuts as part of broader restructuring efforts. Novartis is reducing its U.S. workforce by 427 employees at its East Hanover, New Jersey headquarters between June and October. This follows the company's December 2024 decision to let go of 330 employees and close sites in Germany and Boston acquired from MorphoSys.
Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) continues its sweeping cost-cutting initiative, announcing an additional $2 billion in planned savings through 2027 on top of an ongoing $1.5 billion reduction program. The company is cutting 223 employees in Lawrenceville, New Jersey, bringing total layoffs there to 290 this year. BMS expects these measures to create a "leaner, more efficient company" while investing in growth areas.
Merck revealed plans to eliminate approximately 6,000 jobs globally, affecting around 8% of its workforce, as part of a multiyear process to reduce costs by $3 billion. The cuts will primarily impact administrative, sales, and research and development roles.
Biotech Firms Streamline Operations
Smaller biotech companies are also making difficult decisions to preserve capital and focus on key programs. Intellia Therapeutics announced a 27% workforce reduction, affecting about 142 employees, as it reorganizes to concentrate on high-value gene editing programs. The company will discontinue development of its NTLA-3001 therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-associated lung disease.
Galapagos unveiled plans to split into two entities by mid-2025 and cut 40% of its workforce, impacting about 300 employees across its European operations. The reorganization will result in the closure of its French site and staff reductions in Belgium. The company will create separate innovative medicines and cell therapy businesses.
Cargo Therapeutics disclosed it is laying off 81 employees, or approximately 50% of its workforce, following the discontinuation of a mid-stage study for its lead CAR-T candidate. The cuts are expected to be completed by April 1.
Industry-Wide Trends and Implications
The widespread layoffs reflect broader challenges facing the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors. Companies are grappling with pipeline setbacks, regulatory hurdles, and pressure to improve operational efficiency. Many are prioritizing later-stage assets and cutting early research programs to conserve resources.
The job cuts also highlight the industry's shift towards more focused business models. Several companies are spinning off or divesting non-core assets to concentrate on areas of strength. This trend is likely to continue as firms seek to streamline operations and improve returns on investment.
While the layoffs create immediate hardship for affected employees, they may ultimately lead to a more resilient and sustainable industry. Companies that successfully navigate this period of restructuring could emerge better positioned to drive innovation and deliver new therapies to patients.
As the pharmaceutical landscape continues to evolve, industry observers will be watching closely to see how these strategic shifts impact drug development pipelines and the sector's overall health in the coming years.
References
- CSL Vifor, Bolt Cut Staff
Follow along as BioSpace tracks job cuts and restructuring initiatives throughout 2025.
Explore Further
What financial or operational challenges have prompted companies like Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck to implement large-scale layoffs?
How do the layoffs and restructuring initiatives at biotech firms like Intellia Therapeutics and Galapagos align with their broader strategic goals?
What specific regulatory or pipeline setbacks have contributed to the industry-wide trend of cutting early research programs?
Are there notable examples of companies successfully streamlining operations and achieving improved returns after similar restructuring efforts in the past?
How might the shift towards later-stage assets and divestment of non-core programs impact drug development timelines and innovation in the sector?