FDA Rejects Scholar Rock's SMA Drug, Citing Manufacturing Issues at Novo-Owned Facility

Scholar Rock's bid to introduce the first muscle-targeted treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has hit a roadblock as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected its application for apitegromab. The decision, communicated through a complete response letter (CRL), cited manufacturing concerns at a third-party facility in Indiana, now owned by Novo Nordisk.
Manufacturing Setback at Former Catalent Site
The FDA's rejection stems from observations made during a general site inspection of the Indiana facility, which Novo Nordisk acquired from Catalent as part of a larger $16.5 billion deal finalized in December 2024. Scholar Rock emphasized that the issues identified were not specific to apitegromab's production and that the CRL did not raise concerns about the drug's efficacy or safety.
The facility in question, referred to as Catalent Indiana, performs fill-finish services for apitegromab. In early August, the site submitted a response to address the FDA's concerns and has continued to implement corrective actions, updating the regulatory agency accordingly.
This setback is not isolated to Scholar Rock. The same Bloomington, Indiana facility has been linked to regulatory delays for other pharmaceutical companies, including Regeneron, which faced a two-month delay for its high-dose version of Eylea in 2023 and subsequent holdups for two other Eylea-related decisions in 2025.
Apitegromab's Potential Impact on SMA Treatment
Apitegromab represents a novel approach to SMA treatment, targeting muscle growth and preservation. If approved, it would complement existing therapies that focus on preventing motor neuron loss but do not directly address muscle deterioration. These current treatments include Novartis's Zolgensma, Biogen's Spinraza, and Roche's Evrysdi, all of which have achieved blockbuster status.
Clinical trials have shown promising results for apitegromab when used in combination with standard SMA therapies. In Phase 3 testing, the drug demonstrated significant improvements in motor function compared to typical care alone. Kenneth Hobby, President of Cure SMA, highlighted the urgent need for treatments addressing muscle strength and motor function in the SMA community, emphasizing their importance for patient independence and quality of life.
Scholar Rock's Path Forward
Despite this setback, Scholar Rock remains committed to bringing apitegromab to market. The company plans to resubmit its Biologics License Application (BLA) once the manufacturing issues are resolved, expecting an expedited review from the FDA.
David Hallal, Scholar Rock's chairman and CEO, stated, "We are continuing to work closely with Catalent Indiana on the FDA's manufacturing observations so that we can resubmit the apitegromab BLA as soon as possible."
The company reported a cash balance of $295 million as of June 30, 2025, with its financial runway extending into 2027. While the U.S. launch faces delays, Scholar Rock is also pursuing approval in Europe, with expectations to launch there in 2026. Analysts remain optimistic about apitegromab's potential, with Jefferies projecting peak sales to reach $1.8 billion.
References
- Scholar Rock SMA drug rejected by FDA over manufacturing concerns
The denial sets back a drug Scholar Rock hopes to become part of a new standard of care for spinal muscular atrophy, treatment for which has changed dramatically over the last decade.
- FDA rejects Scholar Rock's SMA drug, citing issues at Novo's Catalent Indiana site
Scholar Rock’s bid to win the first FDA approval for a muscle-targeted treatment for spinal muscular atrophy has been tripped up by inspection issues at a former Catalent production site in Indiana, now owned by Novo Nordisk. The FDA sent a complete response letter to the Massachusetts biotech, rejecting its application for apitegromab.
Explore Further
What specific improvements or corrective actions has the Catalent Indiana facility implemented to address the FDA's manufacturing observations?
How does apitegromab's mechanism of targeting muscle growth and preservation compare to the MOAs of existing SMA treatments like Zolgensma, Spinraza, and Evrysdi?
What are the estimated timelines for Scholar Rock's resubmission of the apitegromab BLA to the FDA and the potential review period?
How has the regulatory history of the Catalent Indiana facility impacted other drug approvals, and what systemic issues contribute to these recurring delays?
What is the projected market size for muscle-targeted SMA treatments, and how does apitegromab's peak sales estimate of $1.8 billion fit into this landscape?