Rush of Targeted Myasthenia Gravis Therapies Transforms Treatment Landscape

The pharmaceutical industry is witnessing a significant surge in the development and approval of targeted therapies for myasthenia gravis (MG), a rare autoimmune disease that affects neuromuscular junctions. After decades of limited treatment options, the market is now experiencing rapid growth, with analysts projecting revenues to exceed $10 billion by 2033.
New Generation of Targeted Therapies
In the past eight years, five new MG-specific therapies have been approved, marking a dramatic shift in the treatment paradigm. These new drugs target two key pathways in the disease's progression: the complement system and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) signaling.
AstraZeneca's Soliris, approved in 2017, was the first MG-specific therapy to hit the market as a C5 complement inhibitor. This was followed by argenx's Vyvgart in 2021, an FcRn-targeted therapy that degrades disease-causing antibodies. More recent approvals include UCB's Zilbrysq (C5 complement inhibitor) and Rystiggo (FcRn therapy) in 2023, and J&J's Imaavy earlier this year.
Dr. Tom Ragole, a neuromuscular neurologist at the UCHealth Neurosciences Center in Colorado, notes, "Until recently, we hadn't seen a newly approved MG therapy in many decades. The more options we have, the better I see things going moving forward."
Expanding Treatment Options
Despite the recent approvals, pharmaceutical companies continue to invest in research and development for MG treatments. In August, argenx reported positive results from a Phase III trial testing Vyvgart's effectiveness in patients lacking the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody, a population that accounts for approximately 20% of patients with generalized MG (gMG) and often experiences a more severe disease burden.
Regeneron also released promising Phase III results for its RNA-based candidate cemdisiran in patients with AChR-positive gMG. The drug demonstrated efficacy while only inhibiting the complement system by 74%, potentially offering a more balanced approach to treatment.
"There is still a high unmet need for patients in this disease," said Andres Sirulnik, head of the Hematology Clinical Development unit at Regeneron. "A multipronged approach is required."
Future Directions and Market Competition
As the MG treatment landscape becomes increasingly competitive, companies are focusing on differentiating their products and expanding their reach. Argenx plans to file a supplemental application to expand Vyvgart's use in patients with triple-negative MG by the end of 2025, potentially giving it the broadest label among FcRn antagonists. Regeneron aims to submit cemdisiran for FDA approval in the first quarter of 2026.
UCB, currently the only company offering two therapies targeting different pathways, continues to publish long-term safety and efficacy data on Zilbrysq and Rystiggo. The company is also partnering with the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America to develop resources helping patients better understand their treatment options.
As the field evolves, experts anticipate further innovations, potentially drawing inspiration from advances in oncology, such as cell-based therapies and precision medicine approaches. With the rapid pace of development in MG treatments, patients and healthcare providers alike are navigating an increasingly complex but promising therapeutic landscape.
References
- Rush of Targeted Myasthenia Gravis Therapies Hit Once Sparse Market
After decades without much movement, a handful of new treatments for this rare autoimmune disease are now approved, and several companies, including argenx and Regeneron, have recently released promising late-stage trial results.
Explore Further
What are the long-term safety and efficacy results for recently approved myasthenia gravis therapies like Zilbrysq and Rystiggo?
How do newer therapies targeting FcRn and the complement system compare in terms of clinical trial efficacy?
What is the estimated market share for companies like AstraZeneca and argenx within the projected $10 billion MG treatment landscape by 2033?
What differentiates cemdisiran from existing complement-targeting therapies in terms of mechanism of action and trial data?
How might advancements in oncology, such as cell-based therapies, influence future innovation in the MG therapeutic space?