Smith+Nephew Enhances Evidence Generation Through Integrated Clinical and Medical Affairs Approach

In a strategic move to optimize product development and improve patient outcomes, Smith+Nephew has implemented a highly integrated organizational structure that aligns its clinical and medical affairs functions. This approach, detailed by Matt Christensen, Senior Vice President of Global Clinical and Medical Affairs, aims to break down silos and foster collaboration across various departments, ultimately leading to more efficient evidence generation and product launches.
Unified Framework for Clinical and Medical Affairs
Smith+Nephew's integrated model categorizes its clinical and medical affairs division into four interconnected groups:
- Clinical strategy: Responsible for overall evidence generation strategy
- Clinical operations: Manages day-to-day execution of clinical trials
- Evidence and claims: Translates data into regulatory submissions and marketing materials
- Medical affairs: Engages externally with healthcare professionals and key opinion leaders
This structure ensures that all teams work towards common strategic goals while maintaining clear individual responsibilities. The integrated approach provides a holistic view of the product lifecycle, enabling proactive management of challenges and opportunities throughout clinical trials.
Optimizing Evidence Generation: A Case Study
The benefits of Smith+Nephew's integrated approach are exemplified in their strategy for introducing a new hip replacement device in Australia. To meet local regulatory requirements, the team employed a dual-pronged approach:
- Conducted a traditional, industry-sponsored clinical study to gather specific data on device performance
- Leveraged existing data from the Australian national joint replacement registry to supplement long-term data on a broader patient sample
By combining these data sources, Smith+Nephew created a comprehensive dataset that satisfied regulatory requirements while reducing the burden and cost associated with evidence generation. This strategy demonstrates the company's ability to navigate complex regulatory landscapes and address market needs efficiently.
Benefits and Outcomes of Integration
The alignment between clinical and medical affairs has yielded several advantages for Smith+Nephew:
- Accelerated market access
- Improved alignment of evidence generation with regulatory requirements
- Streamlined approval processes
- Reduced risk
- Optimized resource utilization
- Enhanced stakeholder alignment
The collaborative structure also facilitates consistent and accurate information sharing with internal and external partners, including regulatory bodies and healthcare providers. This integrated approach positions Smith+Nephew to deliver innovative, safe, and effective products to patients more rapidly and at scale, ensuring product and patient success in global markets.
References
- Smith+Nephew improves evidence generation by aligning clinical and medical affairs
Clinical teams focus on generating evidence for a product's safety and efficacy, while medical affairs teams act as a bridge to the healthcare community.
Explore Further
What role does the integrated approach play in streamlining regulatory submission processes for Smith+Nephew?
How does Smith+Nephew's use of a dual-pronged approach impact the cost and efficiency of evidence generation?
What are the specific advantages Smith+Nephew gains from aligning clinical and medical affairs functions?
How does the Australian national joint replacement registry data contribute to the evidence generation for Smith+Nephew's hip replacement device?
What challenges does Smith+Nephew face in maintaining stakeholder alignment under the integrated clinical and medical affairs structure?